A single capture walks a site like a real user in Brazil, Germany, California & the UK — pre-consent, accept-all, reject-all, granular and dismiss. Every branch leaves artifacts: a screenshot, the cookie jar, the network beacons, the console, the DOM. Below are three ways to read the same evidence. Can one view inform a dev, a designer and a lawyer?
The consent journey as a node-graph. Pre-consent forks into every path; click a node to crack open its evidence drawer. Switch persona to re-route the whole tree. Best for grasping the shape of behaviour.
Paths down the side, countries across the top, severity as a heatmap. See at a glance that “Reject all” is honoured in one country and ignored in the next. A diff-mode pins two cells side by side. Best for cross-border questions.
A scrollable compliance brief per jurisdiction: a verdict header with grade, then a step-by-step timeline of the run with each finding cited to its raw artifact. Reads like a legal memo; every claim expands to the proof. Best when the output is a document.
Step through the real Browserbase audits of prospect sites frame by frame — actual screenshots, the fork at the consent decision, and tracker states from the cookies each run really wrote. ←→ steps time, ↑↓ flips the path.