CMP verification
Verify Axeptio by country and state
Check the Axeptio configuration visitors actually receive, the choice it saves, and what your tags do with that choice. Choose a location below for the regional check, routing requirements, and a reusable worksheet.
Interactive example · no site is scanned
A saved rejection can still leave a tag running
Example policy: optional analytics must stay off after refusal. Change the evidence for a Axeptio visitor in Germany and see what you can conclude. These values are teaching fixtures.
The saved choice is readable, but observed activity conflicts with the example policy. Trace the affected integration and retest after deployment.
Build your repeatable test plan
6 worksheet rows. First load, acceptance, and refusal each use fresh sessions. The worksheet records actual region, selected rule, expected policy, saved state, and observed activity.
Read the generated test plan
Independently verify Axeptio on https://example.com for a visitor in Germany. CookieTrail offers a Germany country route (de). Confirm the CMP's selected rule in the evidence before interpreting the result. Trace the first tag before the banner is clicked. Start a new browser session and compare the first nonessential cookie or request with the time the consent defaults were set. A German banner can appear after a tag has already run. Run these paths: first load, accept optional categories, reject / opt out. Use fresh isolated sessions for first load, accept, and reject; withdrawal uses its own earlier acceptance. Record the URL, deployed version, actual visitor region, selected CMP rule, expected policy, saved state, cookies, requests, and capture window. Use the installed CMP's documented readback; missing data is inconclusive. Do not equate a TCF applicability flag or a banner language with geography. Compare saved choices with observed behavior against the team's stated policy. A request alone does not establish a violation; Google advanced Consent Mode may send cookieless requests. Do not assume browser evidence covers server-side tracking. Investigate mismatches in my repository and explain each finding with evidence. After I deploy a fix, repeat the same URL, regional rule, and paths, then compare both evidence sets. CookieTrail can capture its supported country routes through its workspace/API/MCP. State/province routing, browser preference signals, and withdrawal require separate verified manual or external browser tests; do not claim those are built-in automated paths. This is a technical test, not legal certification.
Country-route capture is available for CookieTrail’s supported locations. Precise state/province routing, withdrawal, and browser preference signals need separate manual or external tests.
Read Axeptio’s saved state
Check Axeptio's TCF identity and the site's purpose mapping.
- Record the Axeptio script or plugin version, configuration identifier, and published regional rule. Check the deployed site rather than a dashboard preview.
- If this installation enables the IAB Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF), compare its returned cmpId with 260, the ID in Google's inventory. An absent TCF API may simply mean TCF is not enabled.
- Map each saved category or purpose to the site's actual tools. Compare those tools' storage and requests before and after the visitor's decision.
Optional TCF identity and purpose snapshot · CMP ID 260
Use this only when TCF is enabled. Run it again after each decision. The CMP ID identifies the platform; it is not an advertising vendor ID. Compare purpose and vendor permissions separately.
(() => {
if (typeof window.__tcfapi !== "function")
return { status: "TCF unavailable or disabled" };
window.__tcfapi("addEventListener", 2, (data, ok) => {
if (!ok || !data ||
!["tcloaded", "useractioncomplete"].includes(data.eventStatus))
return;
console.log({
cmpId: data.cmpId,
expectedCmpId: 260,
identityMatches: data.cmpId === 260,
cmpStatus: data.cmpStatus,
eventStatus: data.eventStatus,
gdprApplies: data.gdprApplies,
purposeConsents: data.purpose?.consents,
purposeLegitimateInterests: data.purpose?.legitimateInterests
});
window.__tcfapi("removeEventListener", 2,
() => {}, data.listenerId);
});
})()A TCF applicability flag does not verify geography. Legitimate-interest fields and consent fields have different meanings; rejection does not imply every field becomes false. This uses the documented TCF event API; getTCData is deprecated.
These procedures use documented readbacks or manual saved-state checks. They do not imply that CookieTrail has an automated native adapter for every installation. Axeptio is identified in Google’s referenced CMP inventory or partner list.
Choose a visitor location
- Verify Axeptio in GermanyTrace the first tag before the banner is clicked.
- Verify Axeptio in FranceSeparate a claimed audience-measurement exemption from advertising consent.
- Verify Axeptio in SpainFollow the reject path from the first banner layer.
- Verify Axeptio in ItalyTest closing the banner separately from granting consent.
- Verify Axeptio in NetherlandsCompare the visible category choices with the saved decision.
- Verify Axeptio in IrelandCheck withdrawal after an earlier acceptance.
- Verify Axeptio in NorwayCheck the EEA rule as well as the EU country list.
- Verify Axeptio in United KingdomCheck whether an EU-only configuration leaves the UK on a fallback.
- Verify Axeptio in SwitzerlandCheck the Swiss rule explicitly; an EU label is not enough.
- Verify Axeptio in QuebecProve that the CMP selected Quebec, rather than Canada generally.
- Verify Axeptio in CanadaKeep the province in the test record.
- Verify Axeptio in CaliforniaTest sale/share opt-out and browser preference signals separately from cookie rejection.
- Verify Axeptio in ColoradoCheck the universal opt-out path independently of the banner buttons.
- Verify Axeptio in ConnecticutCheck how a browser opt-out reaches the deployed tag configuration.
- Verify Axeptio in DelawareCheck a named state rule against the national fallback.
- Verify Axeptio in IndianaCheck that the deployed state configuration matches the approved release.
- Verify Axeptio in IowaKeep a sensitive-data choice distinct from advertising opt-out.
- Verify Axeptio in KentuckyRetest the Kentucky rule after a CMP configuration rollout.
- Verify Axeptio in MarylandInclude the data-purpose inventory alongside the cookie test.
- Verify Axeptio in MinnesotaTest the consumer request link as well as the banner.
- Verify Axeptio in MontanaCheck state-list updates rather than relying on an old regional template.
- Verify Axeptio in NebraskaTrace opt-out through every advertising integration.
- Verify Axeptio in New HampshireTest a browser signal that conflicts with an earlier saved preference.
- Verify Axeptio in New JerseyCheck grouped state rules for a missing New Jersey entry.
- Verify Axeptio in OregonCheck browser preference signals and ordinary opt-out as separate paths.
- Verify Axeptio in Rhode IslandInclude the privacy notice and its request path in the regional test.
- Verify Axeptio in TennesseeCheck the rule on a second page after the visitor opts out.
- Verify Axeptio in TexasKeep consent defaults and targeted-advertising opt-out separate.
- Verify Axeptio in UtahDefine expected opt-out behavior without copying an EU reject-all model.
- Verify Axeptio in VirginiaVerify the selected state independently of the US East route.
- Verify Axeptio in FloridaSet business scope before defining the Florida test expectation.
- Verify Axeptio in United StatesCheck the country fallback separately from each named state.
- Verify Axeptio in SingaporeRecord the purpose and personal data behind each cookie category.
- Verify Axeptio in BrazilCompare the local banner controls with the saved purpose choices.
- Verify Axeptio in AustraliaInspect tracking pixels as well as browser cookies.
- Verify Axeptio in JapanCheck the purpose mapping rather than importing an EU banner expectation.
- Verify Axeptio in South KoreaInclude behavioral-advertising integrations in the evidence record.
- Verify Axeptio in South AfricaTie the browser test to the team's declared processing purposes.
- Verify Axeptio in New ZealandCheck whether the local visitor receives the intended global fallback.